Residency, fellowship and board certification are not supplied by this CMS file.
Before you book
Ask the practice whether this doctor sees patients of your age for your concern, is accepting new patients, and participates in your exact insurance plan at this location.
Ask who will review your records and follow up if your concerns remain unresolved.
These are 2024 results reported for this clinician’s NPI. Each CMS rating describes one measure of care, not patient reviews or an overall doctor grade. The patients, ages and insurance types included depend on the measure and collection method; these are not necessarily Medicare-only or pediatric results. They do not establish performance at a particular current practice.
CMS assigns 1–5 stars using a separate benchmark for the measure, reporting entity and collection method. Higher ratings indicate better reported performance on that measure. Five stars means the CMS benchmark was met; it does not mean every patient had a good outcome. Ratings should not be averaged across measures.
Diabetes: Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Poor Control (>9%)
CMS rating for this measure:
1 of 5
Patients in the denominator:
791
Collection:
Electronic health records
Lower raw performance rates are better for this measure. Higher CMS ratings are better; the rating above already accounts for the inverse direction.
Measure MIPS_EC_001_overall · Performance year 2024
Advance Care Plan
CMS rating for this measure:
3 of 5
Patients in the denominator:
1,922
Collection:
Qualified registry
Measure MIPS_EC_047_overall · Performance year 2024
Diabetes: Eye Exam
CMS rating for this measure:
1 of 5
Patients in the denominator:
791
Collection:
Electronic health records
Measure MIPS_EC_117_overall · Performance year 2024
Documentation of Current Medications in the Medical Record
CMS rating for this measure:
4 of 5
Patients in the denominator:
10,303
Collection:
Electronic health records
Measure MIPS_EC_130_overall · Performance year 2024
Controlling High Blood Pressure
CMS rating for this measure:
4 of 5
Patients in the denominator:
299
Collection:
Electronic health records
Measure MIPS_EC_236_overall · Performance year 2024
Use of High-Risk Medications in Older Adults
CMS rating for this measure:
5 of 5
Patients in the denominator:
1,944
Collection:
Electronic health records
Lower raw performance rates are better for this measure. Higher CMS ratings are better; the rating above already accounts for the inverse direction.
Measure MIPS_EC_238_overall · Performance year 2024
Preventive Care and Screening: Screening for High Blood Pressure and Follow-Up Documented
CMS rating for this measure:
2 of 5
Patients in the denominator:
9,058
Collection:
Electronic health records
Measure MIPS_EC_317_overall · Performance year 2024
Closing the Referral Loop: Receipt of Specialist Report
CMS rating for this measure:
1 of 5
Patients in the denominator:
49
Collection:
Electronic health records
Measure MIPS_EC_374_overall · Performance year 2024
Released 2026-09-10. Only CMS display-approved MIPS and QCDR clinical measures are shown; participation attestations and cost measures are excluded. CMS uses a benchmark drawn from best performers covering at least 10% of the relevant patient population, with an adjustment for small denominators. ModernDoc has not independently validated these ratings. Source data and reported rates · CMS rating methodology · Coverage and reporting limits.
Reported procedure activity
CMS attributes these procedures to this clinician through Original Medicare and Medicare Advantage claims and encounters. Counts span locations and are not unique-patient counts. They do not establish quality, current availability, or that a procedure is offered at any practice listed here. Other insurance populations are not included.
CMS release 2026-10-15. CMS describes a 12-month observation window with a three-month claims-processing lag; this file does not provide exact start and end dates. Only categories CMS marks for profile display are shown. Source data · How CMS reports procedures.
Patient experience at affiliated groups
No group survey results are linked in this release. Missing information is not a judgment about this doctor’s care.