Skip to content
COVID-19 / SPECIALTY RESEARCH

PsychiatryIn perspective.

The key COVID-19 findings in psychiatry, distilled into a clear, readable brief. The evidence is here whenever you want to go deeper.

INSIDE THIS MONITOR
29cited sources
28available findings

Study findings updated

AI-assisted evidence summary. For general information. These findings are not individual medical advice or a clinician endorsement.

THE SHORT VERSION

What’s worth knowing.

The key findings, what they mean, and the context that matters.

THE HEADLINE TAKEAWAY86%higher relative risk

Long COVID was linked to depressive and anxiety symptoms at 3 years

At 3 years after infection, adults with Long COVID had an 86% higher relative risk of depressive symptoms and a 60% higher relative risk of anxiety symptoms than adults without Long COVID.

This population-based prospective study reports associations at three-year follow-up; it cannot by itself establish causation.

See the evidence

86% higher relative risk, calculated from aRR 1.86. This is not an absolute percentage-point difference.

Risk of depressive symptoms 3 years after COVID-19 in adults with Long COVID vs without

aRR 1.86
95% CI: 1.34-2.57

Ryu, Soomin et al.. Prospective associations between Long COVID and mental health: evidence from a population-based study with a nearly three-year follow-up.. BMC public health. 2026.

Anxiety symptoms at 3 years post-infection in Long COVID vs. no Long COVID

aRR 1.60
95% CI: 1.18-2.16

Ryu, Soomin et al.. Prospective associations between Long COVID and mental health: evidence from a population-based study with a nearly three-year follow-up.. BMC public health. 2026.

02

Brain fog was estimated in 30% of Long COVID populations

30%

A systematic review estimated brain fog prevalence at 30% and cognitive impairment prevalence at 25% in Long COVID populations.

These are systematic-review prevalence estimates in Long COVID populations. The definitions used for brain fog and cognitive impairment are not available in this summary.

See the evidence

Brain fog prevalence in long COVID populations

30%
95% CI: 28-32

Faseeh, Ahmar et al.. Prevalence and long-term outcomes of brain fog and cognitive impairment in individuals with long COVID: A systematic review.. Medicine. 2026.

Cognitive impairment prevalence in long COVID populations

25%
95% CI: 23-27

Faseeh, Ahmar et al.. Prevalence and long-term outcomes of brain fog and cognitive impairment in individuals with long COVID: A systematic review.. Medicine. 2026.

03

COVID-19 survivors: 33.6% had a psychiatric diagnosis within 6 months

33.6%

In an electronic health record cohort of COVID-19 survivors, 33.6% received a psychiatric diagnosis within 6 months, including 12.8% with a first-ever diagnosis.

This retrospective cohort result describes recorded diagnoses after COVID-19. The proportion alone does not show how often diagnoses occurred among people without COVID-19.

See the evidence

Receive a psychiatric diagnosis within 6 months of COVID-19

33.6%

Taquet M, Geddes JR, Husain M, Luciano S, Harrison PJ. 6-month neurological and psychiatric outcomes in 236,379 survivors of COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021;8(5):416-427.

04

Severe COVID-19 was associated with higher self-harm hazard

In a Korean nationwide cohort of individuals with depressive disorder, severe COVID-19 was associated with a higher hazard of self-harm than mild COVID-19.

This observational relative hazard estimate had a wide confidence interval. Absolute self-harm risks are not available in this summary.

See the evidence

Self-harm risk in severe vs. mild COVID-19 among individuals with depressive disorder

aHR 14.83
95% CI: 6.52-33.71

Cho, Jaehyeong et al.. Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 Across 15 Major Health Domains and 67 Diseases in Individuals With Depressive Disorder: A Korean Nationwide Cohort Study.. Journal of Korean medical science. 2026.

Added

05

Observed iTBS remission was lower in Long COVID-associated depression

27.3% vs. 61.4%

After intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), remission on the HAM-D17 depression measure was 27.3% in Long COVID-associated depression versus 61.4% in propensity-matched primary major depressive disorder.

This finding compares treated groups in a propensity-matched retrospective cohort rather than iTBS with no stimulation. Residual unmeasured confounding may remain.

See the evidence

HAM-D17 remission after iTBS in Long COVID-associated depression versus propensity-matched primary MDD; retrospective observational association with residual unmeasured confounding possible.

27.3% vs. 61.4%

Noda, Yoshihiro et al.. Comparative Treatment Response to Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation in Long COVID-Associated Depression Versus Major Depressive Disorder: A Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Cohort Study.. Biomedicines. 2026.

Added

Study-specific findings. Different populations, treatments and follow-up periods can produce different results.

THE RESEARCH, AS IT ARRIVES

Latest studies.

The newest findings added to this collection.
The learning from each, already distilled.

  1. STUDY 01Findings added
    TL;DR

    Observed iTBS remission was lower in Long COVID-associated depression

    27.3% vs. 61.4%

    After intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), remission on the HAM-D17 depression measure was 27.3% in Long COVID-associated depression versus 61.4% in propensity-matched primary major depressive disorder.

    This finding compares treated groups in a propensity-matched retrospective cohort. Residual unmeasured confounding may remain.

    Study details & original results

    Noda, Yoshihiro et al.. Comparative Treatment Response to Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation in Long COVID-Associated Depression Versus Major Depressive Disorder: A Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Cohort Study.. Biomedicines. 2026.

    HAM-D17 remission after iTBS in Long COVID-associated depression versus propensity-matched primary MDD; retrospective observational association with residual unmeasured confounding possible.

    27.3% vs. 61.4%

    Citation in Psychiatry
  2. STUDY 02Findings added
    TL;DR

    Severe COVID-19 was associated with higher self-harm hazard

    In a Korean nationwide cohort of individuals with depressive disorder, severe COVID-19 was associated with a higher hazard of self-harm than mild COVID-19.

    This observational relative hazard estimate had a wide confidence interval. Absolute self-harm risks are not available in this summary.

    Study details & original results

    Cho, Jaehyeong et al.. Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 Across 15 Major Health Domains and 67 Diseases in Individuals With Depressive Disorder: A Korean Nationwide Cohort Study.. Journal of Korean medical science. 2026.

    Self-harm risk in severe vs. mild COVID-19 among individuals with depressive disorder

    aHR 14.83
    95% CI: 6.52-33.71

    Citation in Psychiatry
2 of 2 study updates

Dates show when findings were added here, not when papers were published. Study populations and comparisons differ.

WHEN YOU WANT TO GO DEEPER
See all 28 findingsOriginal results, comparisons and study details.
6 of 6 source groupsFindings stay together with their study.
SOURCE 295 findings

Noda, Yoshihiro et al.. Comparative Treatment Response to Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation in Long COVID-Associated Depression Versus Major Depressive Disorder: A Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Cohort Study.. Biomedicines. 2026.

MADRS improvement after left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex iTBS in medication-free patients with Long COVID-associated depression versus propensity-matched primary MDD; retrospective observational association with residual unmeasured confounding possible.

Added
38.4% vs. 61.5%Source [29]

HAM-D17 improvement after iTBS in Long COVID-associated depression versus propensity-matched primary MDD; retrospective observational association with residual unmeasured confounding possible.

Added
36.7% vs. 58.4%Source [29]
All 5 findings from this source

Adjusted MADRS improvement difference for Long COVID-associated depression versus primary MDD using IPTW and doubly robust models; residual unmeasured confounding cannot be excluded.

Added
-23.0 percentage points; p < 0.001Source [29]

Adjusted HAM-D17 improvement difference for Long COVID-associated depression versus primary MDD using IPTW and doubly robust models; residual unmeasured confounding cannot be excluded.

Added
-21.8 percentage points; p < 0.001Source [29]

HAM-D17 remission after iTBS in Long COVID-associated depression versus propensity-matched primary MDD; retrospective observational association with residual unmeasured confounding possible.

Added
27.3% vs. 61.4%Source [29]
SOURCE 285 findings

Cho, Jaehyeong et al.. Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 Across 15 Major Health Domains and 67 Diseases in Individuals With Depressive Disorder: A Korean Nationwide Cohort Study.. Journal of Korean medical science. 2026.

Infections risk in individuals with depressive disorder post-COVID-19

Added
aHR 1.2795% CI: 1.24-1.30Source [28]

Respiratory disorders risk in individuals with depressive disorder post-COVID-19

Added
aHR 1.5495% CI: 1.49-1.59Source [28]
All 5 findings from this source

Circulatory/respiratory symptoms risk in individuals with depressive disorder post-COVID-19

Added
aHR 1.3495% CI: 1.31-1.37Source [28]

Self-harm risk in severe vs. mild COVID-19 among individuals with depressive disorder

Added
aHR 14.8395% CI: 6.52-33.71Source [28]

Blood disorders risk in severe vs. mild COVID-19 among individuals with depressive disorder

Added
aHR 3.1495% CI: 2.84-3.48Source [28]
SOURCE 013 findings

Taquet M, Geddes JR, Husain M, Luciano S, Harrison PJ. 6-month neurological and psychiatric outcomes in 236,379 survivors of COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021;8(5):416-427.

Any Psychiatric Diagnosis

+44%HR 1.44 (95% CI: 1.40-1.47)Source [1]

Psychosis Risk

+116%HR 2.16 (95% CI: 1.62-2.88)Source [1]
All 3 findings from this source

Depression

+39%HR 1.39 (95% CI: 1.33-1.46)Source [1]
SOURCE 121 finding

Ceban F, Ling S, Lui LMW, et al. Fatigue and cognitive impairment in post-COVID-19 syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Behav Immun. 2022;101:93-135.

Cognitive Impairment

22%Prevalence (95% CI: 18-27%)Source [12]
SOURCE 2612 findings

Ryu, Soomin et al.. Prospective associations between Long COVID and mental health: evidence from a population-based study with a nearly three-year follow-up.. BMC public health. 2026.

Risk of depressive symptoms 3 years after COVID-19 in adults with Long COVID vs without

aRR 1.8695% CI: 1.34-2.57Source [26]

Risk of anxiety symptoms 3 years after COVID-19 in adults with Long COVID vs without

aRR 1.6095% CI: 1.18-2.16Source [26]
All 12 findings from this source

Risk of persistent depressive symptoms at 3-year follow-up relative to no symptoms at either follow-up in adults with Long COVID

RR 2.6495% CI: 1.60-4.35Source [26]

Risk of persistent anxiety symptoms at both follow-ups relative to no symptoms at either follow-up in adults with Long COVID

RR 2.4895% CI: 1.38-4.47Source [26]

Depressive symptoms 3 years after initial infection in adults with Long COVID

aRR 1.8695% CI: 1.34-2.57Source [26]

Anxiety symptoms 3 years after initial infection in adults with Long COVID

aRR 1.6095% CI: 1.18-2.16Source [26]

Persistent depressive symptoms at 3-year follow-up relative to no symptoms at either follow-up in Long COVID patients

RR 2.6495% CI: 1.60-4.35Source [26]

Persistent anxiety symptoms at both follow-ups relative to no symptoms at either follow-up in Long COVID patients

RR 2.4895% CI: 1.38-4.47Source [26]

Depressive symptoms at 3 years post-infection in Long COVID vs. no Long COVID

aRR 1.8695% CI: 1.34-2.57Source [26]

Anxiety symptoms at 3 years post-infection in Long COVID vs. no Long COVID

aRR 1.6095% CI: 1.18-2.16Source [26]

Persistent depressive symptoms at 3-year follow-up relative to no symptoms at either follow-up

RR 2.6495% CI: 1.60-4.35Source [26]

Persistent anxiety symptoms at both follow-ups relative to no anxiety symptoms at either follow-up

RR 2.4895% CI: 1.38-4.47Source [26]
SOURCE 272 findings

Faseeh, Ahmar et al.. Prevalence and long-term outcomes of brain fog and cognitive impairment in individuals with long COVID: A systematic review.. Medicine. 2026.

Cognitive impairment prevalence in long COVID populations

25%95% CI: 23-27Source [27]

Brain fog prevalence in long COVID populations

30%95% CI: 28-32Source [27]
Browse the 29 original sourcesThe complete bibliography behind this monitor.
  1. [1]

    Taquet M, Geddes JR, Husain M, Luciano S, Harrison PJ. 6-month neurological and psychiatric outcomes in 236,379 survivors of COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021;8(5):416-427.

    Open original source in a new tab
  2. [2]

    Taquet M, Sillett R, Zhu L, et al. Neurological and psychiatric risk trajectories after SARS-CoV-2 infection: an analysis of 2-year retrospective cohort studies including 1,284,437 patients. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022;9(10):815-827.

    Open original source in a new tab
  3. [3]

    Helms J, Kremer S, Merdji H, et al. Neurologic features in severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(23):2268-2270.

    Open original source in a new tab
  4. [4]

    Pun BT, Badenes R, Heras La Calle G, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for delirium in critically ill patients with COVID-19 (COVID-D): a multicentre cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2021;9(3):239-250.

    Open original source in a new tab
  5. [5]

    Hampshire A, Trender W, Chamberlain SR, et al. Cognitive deficits in people who have recovered from COVID-19. EClinicalMedicine. 2021;39:101044.

    Open original source in a new tab
  6. [6]

    Mazza MG, Palladini M, De Lorenzo R, et al. Persistent psychopathology and neurocognitive impairment in COVID-19 survivors: effect of inflammatory biomarkers at three-month follow-up. Brain Behav Immun. 2021;94:138-147.

    Open original source in a new tab
  7. [7]

    Al-Aly Z, Bowe B, Xie Y. Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection. Nat Med. 2022;28:2398-2405.

    Open original source in a new tab
  8. [8]

    Pirkis J, John A, Shin S, et al. Suicide trends in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic: an interrupted time-series analysis of preliminary data from 21 countries. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021;8(7):579-588.

    Open original source in a new tab
  9. [9]

    Santomauro DF, Mantilla Herrera AM, Shadid J, et al. Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet. 2021;398(10312):1700-1712.

    Open original source in a new tab
  10. [10]

    Salari N, Hosseinian-Far A, Jalali R, et al. Prevalence of stress, anxiety, depression among the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Global Health. 2020;16:57.

    Open original source in a new tab
  11. [11]

    Wu T, Jia X, Shi H, et al. Prevalence of mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2021;281:91-98.

    Open original source in a new tab
  12. [12]

    Ceban F, Ling S, Lui LMW, et al. Fatigue and cognitive impairment in post-COVID-19 syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Behav Immun. 2022;101:93-135.

    Open original source in a new tab
  13. [13]

    Lopez-Leon S, Wegman-Ostrosky T, Perelman C, et al. More than 50 long-term effects of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2021;11:16144.

    Open original source in a new tab
  14. [14]

    Jahrami H, BaHammam AS, Bragazzi NL, et al. Sleep problems during the COVID-19 pandemic by population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Sleep Med. 2021;17(2):299-313.

    Open original source in a new tab
  15. [15]

    Racine N, McArthur BA, Cooke JE, et al. Global prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms in children and adolescents during COVID-19: a meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2021;175(11):1142-1150.

    Open original source in a new tab
  16. [16]

    Batra K, Singh TP, Sharma M, et al. Investigating the psychological impact of COVID-19 among healthcare workers: a meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(23):9096.

    Open original source in a new tab
  17. [17]

    Sher L. Post-COVID syndrome and suicide risk. QJM. 2021;114(2):95-98.

    Open original source in a new tab
  18. [18]

    World Health Organization. Mental health and COVID-19: Early evidence of the pandemic's impact. Geneva: WHO; 2022.

    Original source link unavailable
  19. [19]

    Wang L, Wang Q, Davis PB, et al. Increased risk for COVID-19 breakthrough infection in fully vaccinated patients with substance use disorders in the United States between December 2020 and August 2021. World Psychiatry. 2022;21(1):124-132.

    Open original source in a new tab
  20. [20]

    Pollard MS, Tucker JS, Green HD. Changes in adult alcohol use and consequences during the COVID-19 pandemic in the US. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(9):e2022942.

    Open original source in a new tab
  21. [21]

    Becker JH, Lin JJ, Doernberg M, et al. Assessment of cognitive function in patients after COVID-19 infection. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(10):e2130645.

    Open original source in a new tab
  22. [22]

    Kennedy M, Helfand BKI, Gou RY, et al. Delirium in older patients with COVID-19 presenting to the emergency department. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(11):e2029540.

    Open original source in a new tab
  23. [23]

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Mental Health, Substance Use, and Suicidal Ideation During the COVID-19 Pandemic. MMWR. 2020;69(32):1049-1057.

    Open original source in a new tab
  24. [24]

    National Institutes of Health. RECOVER Initiative: Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery. NIH COVID-19 Research. 2021-present.

    Original source link unavailable
  25. [25]

    Wang L, Wang Q, Davis PB, et al. Increased risk of mental health disorders following COVID-19. Br J Psychiatry. 2022;221(2):525-530.

    Open original source in a new tab
  26. [26]

    Ryu, Soomin et al.. Prospective associations between Long COVID and mental health: evidence from a population-based study with a nearly three-year follow-up.. BMC public health. 2026.

    Open original source in a new tab
  27. [27]

    Faseeh, Ahmar et al.. Prevalence and long-term outcomes of brain fog and cognitive impairment in individuals with long COVID: A systematic review.. Medicine. 2026.

    Open original source in a new tab
  28. [28]

    Cho, Jaehyeong et al.. Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 Across 15 Major Health Domains and 67 Diseases in Individuals With Depressive Disorder: A Korean Nationwide Cohort Study.. Journal of Korean medical science. 2026.

    Open original source in a new tab
  29. [29]

    Noda, Yoshihiro et al.. Comparative Treatment Response to Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation in Long COVID-Associated Depression Versus Major Depressive Disorder: A Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Cohort Study.. Biomedicines. 2026.

    Open original source in a new tab
ABOUT THIS MONITOR

Understanding includes the limits.

This is an AI-assisted evidence summary, not a clinician endorsement. Read each original paper for its complete methods, population and limitations. Different studies can ask different questions and report different kinds of results.

Dates marked “added” describe when a finding entered this monitor, not when the study was published or clinically reviewed. Personal health and treatment decisions belong in a conversation with a qualified clinician.

KEEP YOUR QUESTIONS CLOSE

A little more understanding.
Wherever you are.

Explore the ModernDoc app