Medical Review Policy
A review label is a claim about a real person and an exact content revision. We treat it that way.
Last updated:
What “medically reviewed” means
We use that label only when a named, credentialed clinician has reviewed the exact revision displayed. The page identifies the reviewer and the review date. We do not infer review from employment, advisory work, a prior version, or an automated quality score.
Reviewer qualifications and conflicts
Review assignments should match the clinician's licensed scope and relevant expertise. Credentials must be verified before attribution. Material financial or professional conflicts that could affect the review should be disclosed or the assignment declined.
What reviewers evaluate
- Whether material clinical claims are accurate and properly scoped.
- Whether citations support the claims attached to them.
- Whether red flags and escalation advice are clear and safe.
- Whether treatment, medication, and risk language omits key cautions.
- Whether uncertainty and evidence limits are stated honestly.
Changes after review
A material content change removes the effective review state until the changed revision is reviewed again. Minor presentation changes that do not alter medical meaning may retain the review record.
Content without clinician review
Automated research content is labeled as AI-assisted or as medical review pending. Passing automated publication checks does not turn that content into clinician-endorsed guidance. Learn more in our editorial methodology and AI transparency policy.