Skip to content
MENOPAUSE / REGULATORY DOCUMENTS

Hormone Therapy Label Tracker

See what each observed product label says, with its document version and date.

3 cited sources14 recorded findings16 tracked labelsStudy findings updated

AI-assisted research summary. These summaries are for general information. Read the original source for the full study and its limitations.

THE LABELS, AT A GLANCE

What the documents say.

The wording varies by product and label version. Here’s the picture across the 16 products we track.

10

Broader warning language

The boxed warning still contains the older language.

1

Endometrial warning only

The boxed warning covers endometrial cancer only.

3

No boxed-warning section

No boxed warning appears in the observed document.

2

Not verified

The document could not be verified. Its warning status is unknown.

These are observations of label documents, not FDA approval decisions or a statement that treatment has no risks. Latest verification run .

See the documents behind these numbers ↗
THE SHORT VERSION

What’s worth knowing.

The key findings, what they mean, and the context that matters.

THE HEADLINE TAKEAWAY80.7%

Awareness of the revised warning outpaced prescribing increases

Among surveyed Latin American physicians, 80.7% knew the revised FDA statement, while 18.7% reported increased menopausal hormone therapy prescribing.

This cross-sectional observational survey relied on self-report and cannot show that the revised statement caused practice changes; recall, social desirability and participation bias may affect the results.

See the evidence

Awareness of the revised FDA statement on MHT among surveyed Latin American physicians

80.7%

Blümel, Juan E et al.. Awareness and clinical impact of the revised FDA warning on menopausal hormone therapy among Latin American physicians. REDLINC XIV.. Menopause (New York, N.Y.). 2026.

Added

Self-reported clinical impact of the revised FDA communication; the authors characterized the increase in prescribing as relatively modest

59.4% reported practice changes; 18.7% reported increased MHT prescribing

Blümel, Juan E et al.. Awareness and clinical impact of the revised FDA warning on menopausal hormone therapy among Latin American physicians. REDLINC XIV.. Menopause (New York, N.Y.). 2026.

Added

02

Menopausal hormone therapy prescribing differed by race and ethnicity

48.7%lower relative odds

At one academic medical center, African American women had 48.7% lower relative odds of a menopausal hormone therapy prescription than White women. Asian and Hispanic women also had lower odds than White women.

These adjusted associations came from a retrospective observational study at one large academic medical center; they cannot explain the differences and may not generalize to other settings.

See the evidence

48.7% lower relative odds, calculated from AOR 0.513. This is not an absolute percentage-point difference.

Odds of an MHT prescription among African American women compared with White women

AOR 0.513
95% CI: 0.486-0.541

Rusk, Kimberly L et al.. From black box warning to wake-up call: menopausal hormone therapy prescribing patterns at a large academic medical center.. Menopause (New York, N.Y.). 2026.

Added

Odds of an MHT prescription among Asian women compared with White women

AOR 0.760
95% CI: 0.688-0.838

Rusk, Kimberly L et al.. From black box warning to wake-up call: menopausal hormone therapy prescribing patterns at a large academic medical center.. Menopause (New York, N.Y.). 2026.

Added

Odds of an MHT prescription among Hispanic women compared with White women

AOR 0.644
95% CI: 0.613-0.676

Rusk, Kimberly L et al.. From black box warning to wake-up call: menopausal hormone therapy prescribing patterns at a large academic medical center.. Menopause (New York, N.Y.). 2026.

Added

03

Physicians reported changing risk discussions and education time

In the Latin American survey, 53.3% reported changing how they explained breast cancer risk, and 40.4% reported changing time spent on patient education and shared decision-making.

These are cross-sectional self-reports, not observed consultations or patient outcomes; recall, social desirability and participation bias may affect the results.

See the evidence

Self-reported changes in explaining breast cancer risk and time spent on patient education and shared decision-making

53.3%; 40.4%

Blümel, Juan E et al.. Awareness and clinical impact of the revised FDA warning on menopausal hormone therapy among Latin American physicians. REDLINC XIV.. Menopause (New York, N.Y.). 2026.

Added

04

Local menopausal hormone therapy was the largest prescription category

At one academic medical center, local menopausal hormone therapy was the largest documented category, followed by systemic and then combination therapy.

This retrospective record review describes prescribing at a single center. It cannot establish why a type was chosen, and prescriptions obtained elsewhere may have been missed.

See the evidence

Distribution of documented MHT prescription types

54.61% local; 37.66% systemic; 7.37% combination; 0.37% unknown

Rusk, Kimberly L et al.. From black box warning to wake-up call: menopausal hormone therapy prescribing patterns at a large academic medical center.. Menopause (New York, N.Y.). 2026.

Added

Study-specific findings. Different populations, treatments and follow-up periods can produce different results.

THE RESEARCH, AS IT ARRIVES

Latest studies.

The newest findings added to this collection.
The learning from each, already distilled.

  1. STUDY 01Findings added
    TL;DR

    Prescribing patterns varied by race and treatment category

    African American, Hispanic and Asian women had lower adjusted odds of a menopausal hormone therapy prescription than White women at one center. Local menopausal hormone therapy was the largest documented category, followed by systemic and combination therapy.

    This retrospective observational study used records from one large academic medical center; it cannot explain the differences, may miss prescriptions obtained elsewhere and may not generalize.

    Study details & original results

    Rusk, Kimberly L et al.. From black box warning to wake-up call: menopausal hormone therapy prescribing patterns at a large academic medical center.. Menopause (New York, N.Y.). 2026.

    Odds of an MHT prescription among African American women compared with White women

    AOR 0.513
    95% CI: 0.486-0.541

    Odds of an MHT prescription among Asian women compared with White women

    AOR 0.760
    95% CI: 0.688-0.838

    Odds of an MHT prescription among Hispanic women compared with White women

    AOR 0.644
    95% CI: 0.613-0.676

    Distribution of documented MHT prescription types

    54.61% local; 37.66% systemic; 7.37% combination; 0.37% unknown

    Citation in The label tracker
  2. STUDY 02Findings added
    TL;DR

    Awareness exceeded reported increases in prescribing

    80.7%

    Among surveyed Latin American physicians, 80.7% knew the revised FDA statement; 59.4% reported practice changes and 18.7% reported increased menopausal hormone therapy prescribing. Changes involved breast cancer risk explanations and time spent on patient education and shared decision-making.

    The cross-sectional observational survey was self-reported and subject to recall, social desirability and participation bias, so it cannot establish that the statement caused the changes.

    Study details & original results

    Blümel, Juan E et al.. Awareness and clinical impact of the revised FDA warning on menopausal hormone therapy among Latin American physicians. REDLINC XIV.. Menopause (New York, N.Y.). 2026.

    Awareness of the revised FDA statement on MHT among surveyed Latin American physicians

    80.7%

    Self-reported clinical impact of the revised FDA communication; the authors characterized the increase in prescribing as relatively modest

    59.4% reported practice changes; 18.7% reported increased MHT prescribing

    Self-reported changes in explaining breast cancer risk and time spent on patient education and shared decision-making

    53.3%; 40.4%

    Citation in The label tracker
  3. STUDY 03Findings added
    TL;DR

    Practice change tracked with protocols and preferences, not clearly with awareness

    Standard hormone therapy protocol use, favorable perceptions of compounded bioidentical hormone therapy, and prioritizing patient preference were associated with more reported practice change. Regulatory awareness and menopause patient volume showed no clear association.

    This cross-sectional survey involved obstetricians and gynecologists. The comparison groups for these estimates are not available in this summary; the reported intervals for awareness and patient volume included no difference.

    Study details & original results

    Cömert, Erhan Hüseyin et al.. Regulatory awareness, counseling priorities, and treatment choices in menopausal hormone therapy: a cross-sectional survey of obstetricians and gynecologists.. Menopause (New York, N.Y.). 2026.

    Standard hormone therapy protocol use associated with reported practice change

    aOR 1.50
    95% CI: 1.05-2.14

    Favorable perceptions of compounded bioidentical hormone therapy associated with reported practice change

    aOR 1.85
    95% CI: 1.35-2.54

    Patient preference prioritization associated with reported practice change

    aOR 1.21
    95% CI: 1.06-1.38

    Regulatory awareness not associated with self-reported change in clinical practice

    aOR 0.89
    95% CI: 0.69-1.14

    Higher menopause patient volume associated with reported practice change

    aOR 1.01
    95% CI: 1.00-1.01

    Citation in The label tracker
3 of 3 study updates

Dates show when findings were added here, not when papers were published. Study populations and comparisons differ.

WHEN YOU WANT TO GO DEEPER
Read the product labelsEach document’s wording, version, source and date checked.

PRODUCT LABEL STATUS

What each product’s observed label document says about its boxed warning — read from the label itself and checked against the version published on DailyMed. A product’s status here is a fact about its label document on the date shown, not a statement about a regulatory decision.

How to read this table

In November 2025 the FDA announced it was initiating removal of boxed warnings from menopausal hormone therapy products, and it approved a first batch of six rewritten labels on 12 February 2026. Manufacturers submit labeling changes for FDA approval; the agency has published no timetable, so which products have updated labels changes over time — which is what this page tracks.

A boxed warning still being present does not mean a label is out of date. The endometrial-cancer boxed warning is retained on systemic estrogen-alone products, so a rewritten label for one of them still carries a boxed warning — covering endometrial cancer only. That is why this table reports what each warning covers rather than whether one exists.

ProductWhat its boxed warning saysLabel document
Prometrium
progesterone
Systemic progestogen-alone
No boxed warning in the observed label
Label version 4, effective
Published by Acertis Pharmaceuticals, LLC
Read the label on DailyMed
Last verified
Divigel
estradiol gel
Systemic estrogen-alone
Boxed warning covers endometrial cancer only

Warning covers: endometrial cancer

“WARNING: ENDOMETRIAL CANCER WITH UNOPPOSED ESTROGEN IN WOMEN WITH A UTERUS”
Label version 31, effective
Published by Vertical Pharmaceuticals, LLC
Read the label on DailyMed
Last verified
Cenestin
synthetic conjugated estrogens, A
Systemic estrogen-alone
Not verified

No authoritative label document is configured for this product; its current warning status has not been verified.

—
Enjuvia
synthetic conjugated estrogens, B
Systemic estrogen-alone
Not verified

No authoritative label document is configured for this product; its current warning status has not been verified.

—
Estring
estradiol vaginal ring
Vaginal (local) estrogen
No boxed warning in the observed label
Label version 7, effective
Published by Pfizer Laboratories Div Pfizer Inc
Read the label on DailyMed
Last verified
Bijuva
estradiol/progesterone
Systemic estrogen + progestogen
No boxed warning in the observed label
Label version 14, effective
Published by Mayne Pharma LLC
Read the label on DailyMed
Last verified
Premarin
conjugated estrogens
Systemic estrogen-alone
Boxed warning still carries the pre-2026 language

Warning covers: breast cancer, cardiovascular disorders, endometrial cancer, lowest dose, shortest duration, probable dementia

“WARNING: ENDOMETRIAL CANCER, CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, BREAST CANCER and PROBABLE DEMENTIA”
Label version 37, effective
Published by Wyeth Pharmaceuticals LLC, a subsidiary of Pfizer Inc.
Read the label on DailyMed
Last verified
Prempro
conjugated estrogens/medroxyprogesterone
Systemic estrogen + progestogen
Boxed warning still carries the pre-2026 language

Warning covers: breast cancer, cardiovascular disorders, endometrial cancer, lowest dose, shortest duration, probable dementia

“WARNING: CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, BREAST CANCER, ENDOMETRIAL CANCER and PROBABLE DEMENTIA”
Label version 39, effective
Published by Wyeth Pharmaceuticals LLC, a subsidiary of Pfizer Inc.
Read the label on DailyMed
Last verified
Estrace Vaginal Cream
estradiol vaginal cream
Vaginal (local) estrogen
Boxed warning still carries the pre-2026 language

Warning covers: breast cancer, cardiovascular disorders, endometrial cancer, lowest dose, shortest duration, probable dementia

“WARNING: ENDOMETRIAL CANCER, CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, BREAST CANCER and PROBABLE DEMENTIA”
Label version 25, effective
Published by Allergan, Inc.
Read the label on DailyMed
Last verified
Climara
estradiol transdermal system
Systemic estrogen-alone
Boxed warning still carries the pre-2026 language

Warning covers: breast cancer, cardiovascular disorders, endometrial cancer, lowest dose, shortest duration, probable dementia

“WARNING: ENDOMETRIAL CANCER, CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, PROBABLE DEMENTIA and BREAST CANCER”
Label version 25, effective
Published by Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Read the label on DailyMed
Last verified
Climara Pro
estradiol/levonorgestrel transdermal system
Systemic estrogen + progestogen
Boxed warning still carries the pre-2026 language

Warning covers: breast cancer, cardiovascular disorders, endometrial cancer, lowest dose, shortest duration, probable dementia

“WARNING: CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, PROBABLE DEMENTIA, BREAST CANCER, and ENDOMETRIAL CANCER”
Label version 27, effective
Published by Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Read the label on DailyMed
Last verified
Vivelle-Dot
estradiol transdermal system
Systemic estrogen-alone
Boxed warning still carries the pre-2026 language

Warning covers: breast cancer, cardiovascular disorders, endometrial cancer, lowest dose, shortest duration, probable dementia

“WARNING: ENDOMETRIAL CANCER, CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, PROBABLE DEMENTIA, and BREAST CANCER”
Label version 17, effective
Published by Sandoz Inc
Read the label on DailyMed
Last verified
Vagifem
estradiol vaginal inserts
Vaginal (local) estrogen
Boxed warning still carries the pre-2026 language

Warning covers: breast cancer, cardiovascular disorders, endometrial cancer, lowest dose, shortest duration, probable dementia

“WARNING: ENDOMETRIAL CANCER, CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, PROBABLE DEMENTIA, and BREAST CANCER”
Label version 22, effective
Published by Novo Nordisk
Read the label on DailyMed
Last verified
Imvexxy
estradiol vaginal inserts
Vaginal (local) estrogen
Boxed warning still carries the pre-2026 language

Warning covers: breast cancer, cardiovascular disorders, endometrial cancer, lowest dose, shortest duration, probable dementia

“WARNING: ENDOMETRIAL CANCER, CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, PROBABLE DEMENTIA, and BREAST CANCER”
Label version 13, effective
Published by Mayne Pharma LLC
Read the label on DailyMed
Last verified
Activella
estradiol/norethindrone acetate
Systemic estrogen + progestogen
Boxed warning still carries the pre-2026 language

Warning covers: breast cancer, cardiovascular disorders, endometrial cancer, lowest dose, shortest duration, probable dementia

“WARNING: CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, PROBABLE DEMENTIA, BREAST CANCER, and ENDOMETRIAL CANCER”
Label version 18, effective
Published by Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC
Read the label on DailyMed
Last verified
Angeliq
drospirenone/estradiol
Systemic estrogen + progestogen
Boxed warning still carries the pre-2026 language

Warning covers: breast cancer, cardiovascular disorders, endometrial cancer, lowest dose, shortest duration, probable dementia

“WARNING: CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, PROBABLE DEMENTIA, BREAST CANCER, and ENDOMETRIAL CANCER”
Label version 20, effective
Published by Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Read the label on DailyMed
Last verified

14 of 16 tracked products verified against DailyMed on . See each row for its verification date or unresolved gap.

How this table is produced

Verified rows come directly from product label documents published by the National Library of Medicine (DailyMed). Automated checks match the pinned document identifier, product name and current version history before reading its boxed-warning section. Quoted warning headings are copied from that document; the status summaries are rule-based, not clinical assessments.

Label documents are not journal articles: they carry no DOI, are not peer reviewed, and cannot be retracted, so the citation and retraction checks that apply to the study findings elsewhere on this monitor do not apply here. When a product cannot be verified, the table says so instead of guessing. This page is AI-assembled and has not been reviewed by a clinician — it is not medical advice, and a drug’s label is the authority, not this summary of it.

See all 14 findingsOriginal results, comparisons and study details.
3 of 3 source groupsFindings stay together with their study.
SOURCE 026 findings

Rusk, Kimberly L et al.. From black box warning to wake-up call: menopausal hormone therapy prescribing patterns at a large academic medical center.. Menopause (New York, N.Y.). 2026.

Distribution of documented MHT prescription types

Added
54.61% local; 37.66% systemic; 7.37% combination; 0.37% unknownSource [2]

Odds of an MHT prescription among African American women compared with White women

Added
AOR 0.51395% CI: 0.486-0.541Source [2]
All 6 findings from this source

Odds of an MHT prescription among Hispanic women compared with White women

Added
AOR 0.64495% CI: 0.613-0.676Source [2]

Odds of an MHT prescription among Asian women compared with White women

Added
AOR 0.76095% CI: 0.688-0.838Source [2]

Association between greater comorbidity burden and odds of an MHT prescription

Added
AOR 0.845 per one-point CCI increase95% CI: 0.833-0.856Source [2]

Association between a documented urinary tract infection history and odds of an MHT prescription

Added
AOR 11.05695% CI: 10.556-11.580Source [2]
SOURCE 033 findings

Blümel, Juan E et al.. Awareness and clinical impact of the revised FDA warning on menopausal hormone therapy among Latin American physicians. REDLINC XIV.. Menopause (New York, N.Y.). 2026.

Awareness of the revised FDA statement on MHT among surveyed Latin American physicians

Added

Self-reported clinical impact of the revised FDA communication; the authors characterized the increase in prescribing as relatively modest

Added
59.4% reported practice changes; 18.7% reported increased MHT prescribingSource [3]
All 3 findings from this source

Self-reported changes in explaining breast cancer risk and time spent on patient education and shared decision-making

Added
53.3%; 40.4%Source [3]
SOURCE 015 findings

Cömert, Erhan Hüseyin et al.. Regulatory awareness, counseling priorities, and treatment choices in menopausal hormone therapy: a cross-sectional survey of obstetricians and gynecologists.. Menopause (New York, N.Y.). 2026.

Regulatory awareness not associated with self-reported change in clinical practice

Added
aOR 0.8995% CI: 0.69-1.14Source [1]

Standard hormone therapy protocol use associated with reported practice change

Added
aOR 1.5095% CI: 1.05-2.14Source [1]
All 5 findings from this source

Favorable perceptions of compounded bioidentical hormone therapy associated with reported practice change

Added
aOR 1.8595% CI: 1.35-2.54Source [1]

Patient preference prioritization associated with reported practice change

Added
aOR 1.2195% CI: 1.06-1.38Source [1]

Higher menopause patient volume associated with reported practice change

Added
aOR 1.0195% CI: 1.00-1.01Source [1]
Browse the 3 original sourcesThe full bibliography behind this monitor.
  1. [1]

    Cömert, Erhan Hüseyin et al.. Regulatory awareness, counseling priorities, and treatment choices in menopausal hormone therapy: a cross-sectional survey of obstetricians and gynecologists.. Menopause (New York, N.Y.). 2026.

    Open original source in a new tab
  2. [2]

    Rusk, Kimberly L et al.. From black box warning to wake-up call: menopausal hormone therapy prescribing patterns at a large academic medical center.. Menopause (New York, N.Y.). 2026.

    Open original source in a new tab
  3. [3]

    Blümel, Juan E et al.. Awareness and clinical impact of the revised FDA warning on menopausal hormone therapy among Latin American physicians. REDLINC XIV.. Menopause (New York, N.Y.). 2026.

    Open original source in a new tab
ABOUT THIS MONITOR

The evidence, with its limits.

Study findings are generated with AI assistance and have not been reviewed by a clinician. The date on each finding records when it was added to this monitor; it is not the publication date or a clinical review date.

Product-label observations are presented separately from study findings. Each label row identifies the document, version and date checked.

This monitor does not offer individual treatment advice. Bring personal health questions to a qualified clinician.

Download and methodology

Download the findings and bibliography displayed in this page snapshot. Values and confidence intervals remain as reported text; this is not a pooled estimate or a systematic review. Product-label observations and editorial takeaways are excluded.

These findings may omit evidence or contain errors and have not been reviewed by a clinician. A citation or download does not establish source verification. Read the original studies for their methods and limitations.

“Added” dates record entry into the monitor, not publication or clinical review. A null original acquisition or derivation means its historical record is unknown; a current record or verification has its own observation time. The SHA-256 snapshot identifier binds the downloadable public fields. CSV includes finding rows and bibliography-only source rows; JSON includes both lists. Spreadsheet-sensitive CSV cells begin with an apostrophe for safety; JSON preserves the original text.

For attribution, cite ModernDoc and the page URL, data update date and snapshot identifier in the download. Original studies retain their own rights; this download does not grant a licence to their full text.