Skip to content
GLP-1 RESEARCH MONITOR

Beyond
the headlines.

The important GLP-1 findings, distilled. Start with the numbers and what they mean, then explore the latest studies.

Original sourcesVisible context
Fresh citrus in soft natural lightFIELD NOTES / 02
Beyond the headlines
THE COLLECTION

GLP-1, in perspective.

3Research monitors
70Distinct cited sources
Sep 16, 2026Latest study findings update
01CHOOSE YOUR STARTING POINT

The questions. The evidence.

From the individual treatments to the bigger questions around access.

01 / Evidence monitor

Semaglutide

-11.85%average difference between groups

Subcutaneous semaglutide reduced weight but raised discontinuation

In adults with overweight or obesity without type 2 diabetes, subcutaneous semaglutide produced greater percentage body-weight loss than placebo; the mean difference was -11.85%.

Discontinuation because of adverse events was also higher with semaglutide than placebo. The treatment timeframe is not available in this summary.
38 cited sources133 findings
Findings updated Sep 16, 2026
02 / Evidence monitor

Tirzepatide

-19.28%

Tirzepatide produced substantial weight loss in randomized trials

A randomized-trial network meta-analysis found 19.28% greater weight loss with tirzepatide than placebo. In an open-label randomized trial, weight change was -20.2% with tirzepatide versus -13.7% with semaglutide at 72 weeks.

The placebo comparison involved adults with overweight or obesity without diabetes; head-to-head evidence in that network was limited. The semaglutide comparison came from a phase 3b active-controlled trial.
36 cited sources120 findings
Findings updated Sep 13, 2026
03 / Evidence monitor

Cost & coverage

Private access was 47.8% for Australian GLP-1 medicines indicated for type 2 diabetes

During May 2024-April 2025, 47.8% of access was private overall, including 26.9% of semaglutide access and all tirzepatide access.

Australian use of GLP-1 medicines indicated for type 2 diabetes. Actual patient payments and the treatment indication for each use are not available in this summary.
7 cited sources24 findings
Findings updated Aug 25, 2026

These findings come from different studies and populations. The cards are not a head-to-head treatment comparison.

THE RESEARCH, AS IT ARRIVES

Latest studies.

The newest findings added to this collection.
The learning from each, already distilled.

  1. STUDY 01Findings added
    TL;DR

    Semaglutide subgroup showed weight loss during antipsychotic treatment

    In randomized trials of adjunctive GLP-1 receptor agonists for antipsychotic-treated patients, the semaglutide subgroup showed reductions in body weight and BMI.

    The comparator underlying the semaglutide subgroup estimates is not available in this summary, so their numerical magnitudes are not presented. Between-agent subgroup differences were reported.

    Study details & original results

    Moubarak, Elsayed S et al.. Adjunctive GLP-1 receptor agonists for cardiometabolic risk in antipsychotic-treated patients: A GRADE-assessed meta-analysis of randomized trials.. Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England). 2026.

    Body-weight reduction with semaglutide in a GLP-1 RA type subgroup analysis of randomized trials involving antipsychotic-treated patients; between-agent subgroup differences for weight and BMI were significant at p<0.05.

    MD -11.06 kg

    BMI reduction with semaglutide in a GLP-1 RA type subgroup analysis of randomized trials involving antipsychotic-treated patients; between-agent subgroup differences for weight and BMI were significant at p<0.05.

    MD -3.60 kg/m²

    Citation in Semaglutide
  2. STUDY 02Findings added
    TL;DR

    Tirzepatide produced more weight loss than semaglutide

    -20.2% vs -13.7%

    In an open-label randomized active-controlled trial of adults with overweight or obesity, mean body-weight change at 72 weeks was -20.2% with tirzepatide versus -13.7% with semaglutide.

    Retrospective cohorts also favored tirzepatide, but effects were smaller and heterogeneous, and several cohorts had serious confounding-related bias.

    -20.2% vs -13.7%

    Randomized trial weight loss favored tirzepatide over semaglutide

    In an open-label randomized active-controlled trial, mean weight change at 72 weeks was -20.2% with tirzepatide and -13.7% with semaglutide.

    Real-world cohorts also favored tirzepatide by approximately 2.3-4.4 percentage points, but heterogeneity prevented pooling and four cohorts had serious risk of bias, principally from unadjusted confounding.

    Study details & original results

    Mohamed Abdalla, Samih Abdelmutalab et al.. Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Tirzepatide Versus Semaglutide for Obesity: A Systematic Review.. Cureus. 2026.

    Mean body-weight change at 72 weeks with tirzepatide versus semaglutide in a phase 3b open-label, randomized, active-controlled trial of adults with overweight or obesity.

    -20.2% vs -13.7%

    Range of adjusted between-group weight-loss differences across retrospective real-world cohorts; the advantage was smaller than in the trial and most pronounced at stringent weight-reduction thresholds. Substantial heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis, and four cohorts had serious risk of bias, principally from unadjusted confounding.

    approximately 2.3-4.4 percentage points favoring tirzepatide

    Citation in Semaglutide

    Mean weight change at 72 weeks with tirzepatide versus semaglutide in the included phase 3b open-label randomized active-controlled trial.

    -20.2% vs -13.7%

    Adjusted weight-reduction advantage favoring tirzepatide over semaglutide in real-world cohorts; substantial heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis, and four cohorts were judged at serious risk of bias, principally because of unadjusted confounding.

    Approximately 2.3-4.4 percentage points

    Citation in Tirzepatide
  3. STUDY 03Findings added
    TL;DR

    Spontaneous suicide-related reports cannot establish clinical risk

    47 tirzepatide cases (37 liraglutide; 141 semaglutide)

    There were 47 tirzepatide suicide or self-injury reports among 42,941 eligible European pharmacovigilance reports; semaglutide and liraglutide had higher reporting disproportionality than tirzepatide.

    These were spontaneous reports from 2021 through 2025, not incidence data. Reporting biases apply, and the findings do not establish causality.

    Study details & original results

    Scavone, Cristina et al.. Reporting patterns of suicide- and self-injury-related events involving liraglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide: data from the European pharmacovigilance database.. Frontiers in pharmacology. 2026.

    Reported suicide/self-injury cases among 42,941 eligible EudraVigilance reports from 2021 through 2025. These are spontaneous-report counts, not incidence estimates, and do not establish causality.

    47 tirzepatide cases (37 liraglutide; 141 semaglutide)

    Reporting frequency of suicide/self-injury events with semaglutide versus tirzepatide. This is a spontaneous-report disproportionality comparison, not an estimate of clinical incidence or causal risk, and is subject to pharmacovigilance-reporting limitations.

    ROR 2.69
    95% CI: 1.91-3.83

    Reporting frequency of suicide/self-injury events with liraglutide versus tirzepatide. This is a spontaneous-report disproportionality comparison, not an estimate of clinical incidence or causal risk, and is subject to pharmacovigilance-reporting limitations.

    ROR 2.54
    95% CI: 1.60-4.01

    Citation in Tirzepatide
  4. STUDY 04Findings added
    TL;DR

    Semaglutide was followed by weight loss after bariatric surgery

    9.02% total weight loss

    Among adults starting an incretin receptor agonist at least one year after metabolic bariatric surgery, semaglutide was associated with 9.02% total weight loss at 12 months.

    Heterogeneity across studies was substantial. At 6 months, tirzepatide produced greater total weight loss than semaglutide, but that pooled comparison was also heterogeneous.

    4.23% greater mean total weight loss

    Weight-loss meta-analysis favored tirzepatide over semaglutide after surgery

    At 6 months, the meta-analysis favored tirzepatide over semaglutide by 4.23% in mean total weight loss.

    The meta-analysis included adults treated at least one year after metabolic bariatric surgery. Substantial heterogeneity across studies requires cautious interpretation.

    Study details & original results

    Santos-Pereira, Mariana et al.. Use of incretin receptor agonists in patients submitted to metabolic bariatric surgery - a systematic review and meta-analysis.. Frontiers in endocrinology. 2026.

    Total weight loss at 12 months with semaglutide in adults treated with an incretin receptor agonist at least one year after metabolic bariatric surgery; substantial heterogeneity across studies requires cautious interpretation.

    9.02% total weight loss

    Mean difference in total weight loss at 6 months for tirzepatide versus semaglutide after metabolic bariatric surgery; substantial heterogeneity across studies requires cautious interpretation.

    MD 4.23% favoring tirzepatide

    Citation in Semaglutide

    At 6 months, tirzepatide was favored over semaglutide for total weight loss among adults treated at least one year after metabolic bariatric surgery; the authors cautioned that substantial heterogeneity across studies requires cautious interpretation.

    4.23% greater mean total weight loss

    Citation in Tirzepatide
4 of 12 study updates

Dates show when findings were added here, not when papers were published. Study populations and comparisons differ.

02 / KEEP THE CONTEXT

Understanding begins
with a closer look.

A study follows a particular group of people, over a particular period of time. The details help you see what a result can — and cannot — tell you.

AI-assisted study summaries for general information. Read the original source and discuss personal treatment questions with a qualified clinician.

How these monitors are made
THE MODERNDOC APPROACH

A closer look.
A clearer perspective.

Read our approach
01

The source stays in view.

Every finding belongs to a particular paper. Follow it back to the original research.

02

Context comes with the number.

Keep the population, comparison and uncertainty alongside the result.

03

The limits belong here, too.

AI-assisted evidence summaries are not a clinician endorsement or a personal treatment recommendation.