Skip to content
GLP-1 / EVIDENCE MONITOR

GLP-1 Cost & Insurance Coverage

Look at the research on affordability, coverage and the economics of treatment.

13 cited sources41 recorded findingsStudy findings updated

AI-assisted research summary. These summaries are for general information. Read the original source for the full study and its limitations.

THE SHORT VERSION

What’s worth knowing.

The key findings, what they mean, and the context that matters.

THE HEADLINE TAKEAWAYInsurance coverage discontinuation 37.7%; high medication costs 20.3%; side effects 27.1%

Insurance loss, costs and side effects were reported stopping reasons

Among 512 survey respondents who stopped semaglutide or tirzepatide prescribed for weight management, 37.7% cited loss of insurance coverage, 20.3% high medication costs and 27.1% side effects.

These were self-reported experiences from a single academic health system; selection and recall bias and the cross-sectional design limit conclusions about longer-term discontinuation.

See the evidence

Reported reasons for treatment discontinuation among 512 survey respondents who discontinued semaglutide or tirzepatide

Insurance coverage discontinuation 37.7%; high medication costs 20.3%; side effects 27.1%

Tewksbury, Colleen et al.. Patient characteristics and early experiences with anti-obesity medications: the CAMP study.. Frontiers in nutrition. 2026.

Added

Self-reported prescription fulfillment and treatment continuation among 2,628 survey respondents prescribed semaglutide or tirzepatide for weight management

90.1% filled the initial prescription; 80.5% remained on treatment

Tewksbury, Colleen et al.. Patient characteristics and early experiences with anti-obesity medications: the CAMP study.. Frontiers in nutrition. 2026.

Added

02

A tirzepatide price increase coincided with more semaglutide starts

+31.15 percentage points

In September 2025, semaglutide initiation was 31.15 percentage points above the projected pre-interruption trend around the tirzepatide list-price increase.

This observational study involved self-paying UK adults with overweight or obesity using one telehealth provider. It cannot establish that the price change caused the shift.

See the evidence

Change in semaglutide initiation in September 2025, around the tirzepatide list-price increase, relative to the projected pre-interruption trend.

+31.15 percentage points
95% CI: 26.07-36.24

Dix, Sophie et al.. Real-World Treatment Patterns and Weight Outcomes Before and After a Tirzepatide Price Increase in Over One Million Self-Paying UK Adults With Overweight or Obesity.. Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2026.

Added

Initial treatment selection among 1,033,522 adults initiating therapy through one UK telehealth provider from May 2024 through January 2026.

90.2% tirzepatide vs 9.8% semaglutide

Dix, Sophie et al.. Real-World Treatment Patterns and Weight Outcomes Before and After a Tirzepatide Price Increase in Over One Million Self-Paying UK Adults With Overweight or Obesity.. Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2026.

Added

03

Prescription uptake was lower in the lowest socioeconomic-status provider areas

adjusted OR 0.75

For semaglutide or tirzepatide, the adjusted prescription odds ratio was 0.75 for patients seen by providers in the lowest versus highest neighborhood socioeconomic-status quartile.

Retrospective data covered commercially insured adults aged 18-64 with overweight or obesity and without type 2 diabetes. Provider neighborhood status was a proxy for patient socioeconomic status, and causation cannot be inferred.

See the evidence

Semaglutide or tirzepatide prescription uptake among patients seen by providers in the lowest versus highest neighborhood SES quartile

adjusted OR 0.75
95% CI: 0.73-0.78

Le, Minh Trung et al.. Sociodemographic disparities in semaglutide and tirzepatide prescription for obesity treatment.. Health affairs scholar. 2026.

Added

Six-month cumulative incidence of semaglutide or tirzepatide prescription from 2021 to 2025 among commercially insured adults aged 18-64 with overweight or obesity and without type 2 diabetes

1.9% to 16.6%

Le, Minh Trung et al.. Sociodemographic disparities in semaglutide and tirzepatide prescription for obesity treatment.. Health affairs scholar. 2026.

Added

04

Tirzepatide cohort had lower costs excluding the medicine

-$319 per person per month (25.4% reduction)

At 12-18 months, the difference in all-cause healthcare costs excluding tirzepatide was -$319 per person per month (25.4% reduction) for the tirzepatide cohort versus propensity score-matched untreated controls.

Matched cohort of adults aged over 55 Years with obesity or overweight without diabetes. Because tirzepatide cost was excluded, this does not establish lower total treatment spending.

See the evidence

Difference-in-differences estimate for all-cause healthcare costs excluding tirzepatide at 12-18 months versus propensity score-matched untreated controls

-$319 per person per month (25.4% reduction)
95% CI: -$544 to -$94

Upadhyay, Navneet et al.. Trends in Cost of Care With Tirzepatide in Adults Aged Over 55 Years With Obesity or Overweight Without Diabetes: A Matched Cohort Analysis.. Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2026.

Added

05

Private access was 47.8% for Australian GLP-1 medicines indicated for type 2 diabetes

For Australian GLP-1 medicines indicated for type 2 diabetes, 47.8% of access was private overall; 26.9% of semaglutide and all tirzepatide access was private.

Measured during May 2024-April 2025. These are medicine-access estimates, not patient-level insurance benefits, affordability or health outcomes; study design details are not available in this summary.

See the evidence

Private access to GLP-1 medicines indicated for type 2 diabetes in Australia during May 2024-April 2025

47.8% privately accessed overall; 26.9% of semaglutide and all tirzepatide

Falster, Michael O et al.. Trends in publicly subsidized and private access to GLP-1 medicines indicated for type 2 diabetes in Australia, 2020-2025.. British journal of clinical pharmacology. 2026.

Added

Change in total Australian sales of GLP-1 medicines indicated for type 2 diabetes from May 2020 through April 2025

Almost 10-fold increase

Falster, Michael O et al.. Trends in publicly subsidized and private access to GLP-1 medicines indicated for type 2 diabetes in Australia, 2020-2025.. British journal of clinical pharmacology. 2026.

Added

06

Peru retail scenario projected semaglutide 2.4 mg costs

S/16,804.86 per patient in year 1; S/18,135.52 per patient in a maintenance year

Semaglutide 2.4 mg was estimated at S/16,804.86 per patient in year 1 and S/18,135.52 per patient in a maintenance year in a supplementary high-cost non-governmental retail scenario.

This was not an expected institutional procurement estimate; the figures apply only to the supplementary retail scenario used in the Peruvian analysis.

See the evidence

Semaglutide 2.4 mg costs in a supplementary high-cost non-governmental retail scenario, not an expected institutional procurement estimate.

S/16,804.86 per patient in year 1; S/18,135.52 per patient in a maintenance year

Vera Ponce, Victor J. Projected budget impact of pharmacotherapy scenarios for obesity and related conditions in Peru: A national survey analysis of 76,819 participants.. Obesity pillars. 2026.

Added

Study-specific findings. Different populations, treatments and follow-up periods can produce different results.

THE RESEARCH, AS IT ARRIVES

Latest studies.

The newest findings added to this collection.
The learning from each, already distilled.

  1. STUDY 01Findings added
    TL;DR

    Modeled tirzepatide cost-effectiveness versus semaglutide

    $34,423.89/QALY

    Over 68 weeks, modeled incremental cost-effectiveness for tirzepatide versus semaglutide was $34,423.89 per quality-adjusted life-year.

    This payer analysis covered Iranian adults with overweight or obesity without diabetes. Iran's 2026 willingness-to-pay threshold was PPP $15,558.5 per quality-adjusted life-year. Clinical-effectiveness and adverse-event inputs came from published literature rather than head-to-head trials, and the country-specific pricing context limits generalizability.

    Study details & original results

    Reiszadeh, Negin et al.. Economic evaluation of tirzepatide, semaglutide, and liraglutide in the treatment of obese and overweight patients without diabetes: a short-term cost-effectiveness analysis in Iran.. Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders. 2026.

    Semaglutide was considered cost-effective at Iran's 2026 willingness-to-pay threshold, defined as one GDP per capita

    PPP $15,558.5/QALY

    Modeled 68-week incremental cost-effectiveness of tirzepatide versus semaglutide among Iranian adults with overweight or obesity without diabetes, from the payer perspective

    $34,423.89/QALY

    Citation in Cost & coverage
  2. STUDY 02Findings added
    TL;DR

    A tirzepatide price increase coincided with more semaglutide starts

    +31.15 percentage points

    In September 2025, semaglutide initiation was 31.15 percentage points above the projected pre-interruption trend around the tirzepatide list-price increase.

    Tirzepatide-to-semaglutide switching also rose 9.26 percentage points, then attenuated; sensitivity analyses supported anticipatory changes in August 2025. These observational data came from self-paying UK adults with overweight or obesity using one telehealth provider and cannot establish causation.

    Study details & original results

    Dix, Sophie et al.. Real-World Treatment Patterns and Weight Outcomes Before and After a Tirzepatide Price Increase in Over One Million Self-Paying UK Adults With Overweight or Obesity.. Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2026.

    Change in semaglutide initiation in September 2025, around the tirzepatide list-price increase, relative to the projected pre-interruption trend.

    +31.15 percentage points
    95% CI: 26.07-36.24

    Change in tirzepatide-to-semaglutide switching around the price increase; the increase subsequently attenuated, and sensitivity analyses supported anticipatory changes in August 2025.

    +9.26 percentage points
    95% CI: 7.09-11.42

    Initial treatment selection among 1,033,522 adults initiating therapy through one UK telehealth provider from May 2024 through January 2026.

    90.2% tirzepatide vs 9.8% semaglutide

    Citation in Cost & coverage
  3. STUDY 03Findings added
    TL;DR

    Higher first recorded tirzepatide doses tracked discontinuation

    44%higher relative hazard

    Compared with a first recorded tirzepatide dose of 2.5 mg, 15 mg was associated with a 44% higher relative hazard of observed discontinuation.

    A 10 mg first dose also had a 24% higher relative hazard versus 2.5 mg. Retrospective data from one private provider in Poland cannot establish causality; affordability and tolerability were not measured.

    Study details & original results

    Dziewierz, Artur et al.. Tirzepatide persistence, adherence, and dose escalation in a real-world setting with high out-of-pocket costs: a Polish cohort study.. Advances in medical sciences. 2026.

    Observed tirzepatide discontinuation among patients whose first recorded dose was 15 mg versus 2.5 mg

    HR 1.44
    95% CI: 1.26-1.64

    Observed tirzepatide discontinuation among patients whose first recorded dose was 10 mg versus 2.5 mg

    HR 1.24
    95% CI: 1.12-1.39

    44% higher relative hazard, calculated from HR 1.44. This is not an absolute percentage-point difference.

    Citation in Cost & coverage
  4. STUDY 04Findings added
    TL;DR

    Semaglutide or tirzepatide uptake rose, with provider-area disparities

    adjusted OR 0.75

    From 2021 to 2025, six-month prescription incidence rose from 1.9% to 16.6% among commercially insured adults with overweight or obesity and no type 2 diabetes. The adjusted odds ratio was 0.75 for lowest versus highest provider-neighborhood socioeconomic quartile.

    Adults were aged 18-64. Provider-neighborhood socioeconomic status was a proxy for patient status, and retrospective observational data cannot establish causation.

    Study details & original results

    Le, Minh Trung et al.. Sociodemographic disparities in semaglutide and tirzepatide prescription for obesity treatment.. Health affairs scholar. 2026.

    Semaglutide or tirzepatide prescription uptake among patients seen by providers in the lowest versus highest neighborhood SES quartile

    adjusted OR 0.75
    95% CI: 0.73-0.78

    Six-month cumulative incidence of semaglutide or tirzepatide prescription from 2021 to 2025 among commercially insured adults aged 18-64 with overweight or obesity and without type 2 diabetes

    1.9% to 16.6%

    Citation in Cost & coverage
4 of 13 study updates

Dates show when findings were added here, not when papers were published. Study populations and comparisons differ.

WHEN YOU WANT TO GO DEEPER
See all 41 findingsOriginal results, comparisons and study details.
13 of 13 source groupsFindings stay together with their study.
SOURCE 132 findings

Reiszadeh, Negin et al.. Economic evaluation of tirzepatide, semaglutide, and liraglutide in the treatment of obese and overweight patients without diabetes: a short-term cost-effectiveness analysis in Iran.. Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders. 2026.

Modeled 68-week incremental cost-effectiveness of tirzepatide versus semaglutide among Iranian adults with overweight or obesity without diabetes, from the payer perspective

Added
$34,423.89/QALYSource [13]

Semaglutide was considered cost-effective at Iran's 2026 willingness-to-pay threshold, defined as one GDP per capita

Added
PPP $15,558.5/QALYSource [13]
SOURCE 123 findings

Dix, Sophie et al.. Real-World Treatment Patterns and Weight Outcomes Before and After a Tirzepatide Price Increase in Over One Million Self-Paying UK Adults With Overweight or Obesity.. Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2026.

Initial treatment selection among 1,033,522 adults initiating therapy through one UK telehealth provider from May 2024 through January 2026.

Added
90.2% tirzepatide vs 9.8% semaglutideSource [12]

Change in semaglutide initiation in September 2025, around the tirzepatide list-price increase, relative to the projected pre-interruption trend.

Added
+31.15 percentage points95% CI: 26.07-36.24Source [12]
All 3 findings from this source

Change in tirzepatide-to-semaglutide switching around the price increase; the increase subsequently attenuated, and sensitivity analyses supported anticipatory changes in August 2025.

Added
+9.26 percentage points95% CI: 7.09-11.42Source [12]
SOURCE 102 findings

Le, Minh Trung et al.. Sociodemographic disparities in semaglutide and tirzepatide prescription for obesity treatment.. Health affairs scholar. 2026.

Six-month cumulative incidence of semaglutide or tirzepatide prescription from 2021 to 2025 among commercially insured adults aged 18-64 with overweight or obesity and without type 2 diabetes

Added
1.9% to 16.6%Source [10]

Semaglutide or tirzepatide prescription uptake among patients seen by providers in the lowest versus highest neighborhood SES quartile

Added
adjusted OR 0.7595% CI: 0.73-0.78Source [10]
SOURCE 115 findings

Dziewierz, Artur et al.. Tirzepatide persistence, adherence, and dose escalation in a real-world setting with high out-of-pocket costs: a Polish cohort study.. Advances in medical sciences. 2026.

Observed tirzepatide discontinuation among patients whose first recorded dose was 15 mg versus 2.5 mg

Added
HR 1.4495% CI: 1.26-1.64Source [11]

Observed tirzepatide discontinuation among patients whose first recorded dose was 10 mg versus 2.5 mg

Added
HR 1.2495% CI: 1.12-1.39Source [11]
All 5 findings from this source

Medication adherence among the 385 patients with observed tirzepatide persistence for at least 180 days

Added
Median PDC 0.86 (IQR 0.73-0.95)Source [11]

Proportion classified as adherent, defined as PDC ≥80%, among the 385 patients persistent for at least 180 days

Added

Escalation to at least 10 mg among eligible patients with a low first recorded tirzepatide dose

Added
25.8% (565/2,194); 18.6% of the full cohortSource [11]
SOURCE 093 findings

Kulkarni, Neeti S et al.. The Conventional Cost-Effectiveness and Distributional Cost-Effectiveness of Semaglutide for Obesity Treatment.. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.). 2026.

Modeled incremental cost-effectiveness versus no treatment over 25 years among Black and White adults aged 65–70 with BMI ≥35 and cardiovascular disease

Added
$7,300/QALY for semaglutide and $12,100/QALY for LSGSource [9]

Modeled incremental cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy compared with semaglutide in the defined population

Added
$53,700/QALYSource [9]
All 3 findings from this source

Inequality-aversion threshold at which semaglutide became distributionally cost-effective compared with LSG in the model

Added
ε ≥ 14.72Source [9]
SOURCE 082 findings

Tewksbury, Colleen et al.. Patient characteristics and early experiences with anti-obesity medications: the CAMP study.. Frontiers in nutrition. 2026.

Self-reported prescription fulfillment and treatment continuation among 2,628 survey respondents prescribed semaglutide or tirzepatide for weight management

Added
90.1% filled the initial prescription; 80.5% remained on treatmentSource [8]

Reported reasons for treatment discontinuation among 512 survey respondents who discontinued semaglutide or tirzepatide

Added
Insurance coverage discontinuation 37.7%; high medication costs 20.3%; side effects 27.1%Source [8]
SOURCE 063 findings

Upadhyay, Navneet et al.. Trends in Cost of Care With Tirzepatide in Adults Aged Over 55 Years With Obesity or Overweight Without Diabetes: A Matched Cohort Analysis.. Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2026.

Difference-in-differences estimate for all-cause healthcare costs excluding tirzepatide at 6-12 months versus propensity score-matched untreated controls

Added
-$145 per person per month (12.3% reduction)95% CI: -$266 to -$25Source [6]

Difference-in-differences estimate for all-cause healthcare costs excluding tirzepatide at 12-18 months versus propensity score-matched untreated controls

Added
-$319 per person per month (25.4% reduction)95% CI: -$544 to -$94Source [6]
All 3 findings from this source

Inpatient/emergency department visit incidence with tirzepatide versus untreated controls during 12-18 months

Added
IRR 0.6995% CI: 0.50-0.94Source [6]
SOURCE 073 findings

Scannell, Christopher et al.. Changes in Semaglutide Fills Following Expanded FDA and Medicare Policies.. The American journal of managed care. 2026.

Relative increase in Wegovy utilization compared with the prepolicy period

Added
136.4% increaseSource [7]

Relative increase in Wegovy utilization through Medicare Part D

Added
598.1% increaseSource [7]
All 3 findings from this source

Estimated additional Wegovy fills associated with expanded FDA indications and Medicare coverage by September 2024

Added
592,624 additional fillsSource [7]
SOURCE 052 findings

Belančić, Andrej et al.. Trends in glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist utilization and expenditure in Croatia.. The Journal of international medical research. 2026.

National GLP-1 RA utilization in Croatia in 2024

Added
15.99 defined daily doses per 1000 inhabitants per day; 16.1% of total prescriptionsSource [5]

National expenditure on GLP-1 RAs in Croatia in 2024

Added
€42.07 million; 42.7% of total noninsulin antidiabetic spendingSource [5]
SOURCE 043 findings

Vera Ponce, Victor J. Projected budget impact of pharmacotherapy scenarios for obesity and related conditions in Peru: A national survey analysis of 76,819 participants.. Obesity pillars. 2026.

Survey-observable candidate populations in Peru estimated from pooled ENDES 2022-2024 data comprising 76,819 records.

Added
7.54 million adults with BMI-defined obesity; 9.04 million meeting the broad criterion; 3.67 million meeting pragmatic prioritySource [4]

Projected annual gross medication-acquisition budgets at hypothetical 100% coverage. Naltrexone/bupropion used an IETSI-reported scenario; liraglutide was a high-cost non-governmental retail scenario rather than an expected institutional procurement estimate, and phentermine/topiramate was an exploratory supplementary comparator.

Added
Broad criterion: S/142.95 billion for liraglutide, S/23.65 billion for naltrexone/bupropion, and S/26.83 billion for phentermine/topiramate; pragmatic priority: S/57.95 billion, S/9.59 billion, and S/10.88 billion, respectivelySource [4]
All 3 findings from this source

Semaglutide 2.4 mg costs in a supplementary high-cost non-governmental retail scenario, not an expected institutional procurement estimate.

Added
S/16,804.86 per patient in year 1; S/18,135.52 per patient in a maintenance yearSource [4]
SOURCE 034 findings

Falster, Michael O et al.. Trends in publicly subsidized and private access to GLP-1 medicines indicated for type 2 diabetes in Australia, 2020-2025.. British journal of clinical pharmacology. 2026.

Change in total Australian sales of GLP-1 medicines indicated for type 2 diabetes from May 2020 through April 2025

Added
Almost 10-fold increaseSource [3]

Private access to GLP-1 medicines indicated for type 2 diabetes in Australia during May 2024-April 2025

Added
47.8% privately accessed overall; 26.9% of semaglutide and all tirzepatideSource [3]
All 4 findings from this source

Distribution of Australian GLP-1 medicine use by product during May 2024-April 2025

Added
Semaglutide 63.3%; tirzepatide 30.7%Source [3]

Estimated monthly Australian access to GLP-1 medicines indicated for type 2 diabetes during May 2024-April 2025

Added
483,000-502,000 monthly users; 180,000-240,000 accessing privatelySource [3]
SOURCE 023 findings

Afentou, Nafsika et al.. Cost-Effectiveness of Endoscopic Bariatric Therapies Compared with Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Semaglutide.. Obesity surgery. 2026.

Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty for class II-III obesity

Added
£10,593/QALYSource [2]

Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty versus semaglutide for class I-II obesity

Added
£7,267/QALYSource [2]
All 3 findings from this source

Semaglutide versus intragastric balloon therapy

Added
Semaglutide dominantSource [2]
SOURCE 016 findings

Kozato, Akio et al.. Evolving utilization of bariatric surgery since the rise of semaglutide and tirzepatide.. Surgical endoscopy. 2026.

Bariatric surgery utilization decline from Q4 2022 peak through Q4 2025

Added
39% decreaseSource [1]

Proportion of bariatric surgery patients with pre-surgery GLP-1RA use in Q4 2025

Added
All 6 findings from this source

Baseline proportion of bariatric surgery patients with pre-surgery GLP-1RA use in Q4 2018

Added

Type 2 diabetes as factor associated with receiving pre-surgery GLP-1RA

Added
RR 2.942.88-3.00Source [1]

15-fold variation in pre-surgery GLP-1RA use between highest and lowest hospitals

Added
RR 0.19-2.88Source [1]

Increase in proportion of Hispanic bariatric surgery patients from Q4 2018 to Q4 2025

Added
8.1% vs. 16.8%Source [1]
Browse the 13 original sourcesThe full bibliography behind this monitor.
  1. [1]

    Kozato, Akio et al.. Evolving utilization of bariatric surgery since the rise of semaglutide and tirzepatide.. Surgical endoscopy. 2026.

    Open original source in a new tab
  2. [2]

    Afentou, Nafsika et al.. Cost-Effectiveness of Endoscopic Bariatric Therapies Compared with Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Semaglutide.. Obesity surgery. 2026.

    Open original source in a new tab
  3. [3]

    Falster, Michael O et al.. Trends in publicly subsidized and private access to GLP-1 medicines indicated for type 2 diabetes in Australia, 2020-2025.. British journal of clinical pharmacology. 2026.

    Open original source in a new tab
  4. [4]

    Vera Ponce, Victor J. Projected budget impact of pharmacotherapy scenarios for obesity and related conditions in Peru: A national survey analysis of 76,819 participants.. Obesity pillars. 2026.

    Open original source in a new tab
  5. [5]

    Belančić, Andrej et al.. Trends in glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist utilization and expenditure in Croatia.. The Journal of international medical research. 2026.

    Open original source in a new tab
  6. [6]

    Upadhyay, Navneet et al.. Trends in Cost of Care With Tirzepatide in Adults Aged Over 55 Years With Obesity or Overweight Without Diabetes: A Matched Cohort Analysis.. Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2026.

    Open original source in a new tab
  7. [7]

    Scannell, Christopher et al.. Changes in Semaglutide Fills Following Expanded FDA and Medicare Policies.. The American journal of managed care. 2026.

    Open original source in a new tab
  8. [8]

    Tewksbury, Colleen et al.. Patient characteristics and early experiences with anti-obesity medications: the CAMP study.. Frontiers in nutrition. 2026.

    Open original source in a new tab
  9. [9]

    Kulkarni, Neeti S et al.. The Conventional Cost-Effectiveness and Distributional Cost-Effectiveness of Semaglutide for Obesity Treatment.. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.). 2026.

    Open original source in a new tab
  10. [10]

    Le, Minh Trung et al.. Sociodemographic disparities in semaglutide and tirzepatide prescription for obesity treatment.. Health affairs scholar. 2026.

    Open original source in a new tab
  11. [11]

    Dziewierz, Artur et al.. Tirzepatide persistence, adherence, and dose escalation in a real-world setting with high out-of-pocket costs: a Polish cohort study.. Advances in medical sciences. 2026.

    Open original source in a new tab
  12. [12]

    Dix, Sophie et al.. Real-World Treatment Patterns and Weight Outcomes Before and After a Tirzepatide Price Increase in Over One Million Self-Paying UK Adults With Overweight or Obesity.. Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2026.

    Open original source in a new tab
  13. [13]

    Reiszadeh, Negin et al.. Economic evaluation of tirzepatide, semaglutide, and liraglutide in the treatment of obese and overweight patients without diabetes: a short-term cost-effectiveness analysis in Iran.. Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders. 2026.

    Open original source in a new tab
ABOUT THIS MONITOR

The evidence, with its limits.

Study findings are generated with AI assistance and have not been reviewed by a clinician. The date on each finding records when it was added to this monitor; it is not the publication date or a clinical review date.

This monitor does not offer individual treatment advice. Bring personal health questions to a qualified clinician.

Download and methodology

Download the findings and bibliography displayed in this page snapshot. Values and confidence intervals remain as reported text; this is not a pooled estimate or a systematic review. Product-label observations and editorial takeaways are excluded.

These findings may omit evidence or contain errors and have not been reviewed by a clinician. A citation or download does not establish source verification. Read the original studies for their methods and limitations.

“Added” dates record entry into the monitor, not publication or clinical review. A null original acquisition or derivation means its historical record is unknown; a current record or verification has its own observation time. The SHA-256 snapshot identifier binds the downloadable public fields. CSV includes finding rows and bibliography-only source rows; JSON includes both lists. Spreadsheet-sensitive CSV cells begin with an apostrophe for safety; JSON preserves the original text.

For attribution, cite ModernDoc and the page URL, data update date and snapshot identifier in the download. Original studies retain their own rights; this download does not grant a licence to their full text.